40–65 %
Faster remediation vs. wash/soda
Industry
Fire Restoration
Dry, chemical-free recovery after fire and smoke
- 40–65 %Faster remediation vs. wash/soda
- 0Water or chemicals added
- –78 °CMedia temperature at impact
Why Dry-Ice for Fire Restoration?
Fire leaves soot, oily smoke film, char, and chloride salts that stain, corrode, and trap odor. Wet methods spread contaminants, prolong dry-time, and risk further damage to structures and electronics.
CO₂ pellets accelerate to high velocity and flash-sublimate on impact. The thermal/acoustic micro-impulse fractures char and lifts soot films without abrasion or moisture, leaving a clean, dry surface.
Crews finish faster with less tear-out and no slurry. Substrates are ready for encapsulant or repaint, electronics avoid re-wetting, and corrosion risk drops—supporting quicker reopenings.
Key takeaways
- Fire leaves soot, oily smoke film, char, and chloride salts that stain, corrode, and trap odor.
- CO₂ pellets accelerate to high velocity and flash-sublimate on impact.
- Crews finish faster with less tear-out and no slurry.
0
Water or chemicals added
–78 °C
Media temperature at impact
1–3 h
Typical zone setup/teardown
2–5×
Less surface tear-out
$25–80k
Typical material & labor savings / job
Core Benefits
Waterless recovery
Avoid secondary water damage and extended dry-times; speed re-occupancy.
Less demolition
Preserve framing, decking, and masonry by removing char without grinding.
Odor source removal
Lift char and soot films that hold odor before sealing or repainting.
Electronics-friendly
Non-conductive and dry—reduce shorting and corrosion on panels and boards.
No secondary waste
CO₂ vaporizes on impact—no slurry or soda to collect and dispose.
Cleaner job sites
Lower dust load than sanding; easier containment and HEPA housekeeping.
Predictable results
Consistent, repeatable finish ready for encapsulants or topcoats.
Lower total cost
Cut consumables, disposal, tear-out, and schedule overruns across projects.
Blasting Machines
ROI Calculator
This model estimates annual savings from downtime avoided, consumables reduced, and optional labor savings. It also shows annualized equipment cost, payback, and year-one ROI.
Quick inputs
Range: 0–10000
Range: 0–24
$
Range: 0–100000
$
Range: 0–1000000
Results
Total annual savings
$63,680
Net annual benefit
$54,747
Payback
4.7 months
ROI (Year 1)
255%
Downtime savings (annual)
$56,160
Consumable savings (annual)
$7,520
Labor savings (annual)
$0
Estimates only. For a formal model including utilities, logistics, and shift coverage, book a demo.
From Inquiry to Production in 3 Steps
- 1
1. Site demo & scope
1. Site demo & scope
Test representative zones—steel, wood, masonry, and panels—to confirm removal rate and finish.
- 2
2. Method & ROI plan
2. Method & ROI plan
Set nozzle/insert and pressure ranges by surface; model pellet usage, labor delta, and schedule savings.
- 3
3. Execute & verify
3. Execute & verify
Run dry-ice cleaning, apply encapsulant as required, and document results for insurer and clearance.
“We saved most of the structural wood and avoided water damage to electrical gear. The site cleared faster with no slurry cleanup.”
Dana R.
Project Manager, Rapid Restore
Restore faster—without water or harsh chemicals
Request a quick, no-obligation quote. We’ll size the right blaster/nozzles, estimate pellet usage, and outline payback across your job mix.
